Lythouse Logo
Register Now for Launch of our ESG platform, explore the ESG trends for 2024.

Home » Blog » Legal & Regulatory Landscape » How to Avoid Greenwashing: Accurate Sustainability Claims for Your Business

How to Avoid Greenwashing: Accurate Sustainability Claims for Your Business

ESG greenwashing

Greenwashing, the act of misleading consumers about the environmental benefits of a product or service, can significantly damage a company’s reputation and financial health. To avoid this, companies must understand what constitutes greenwashing, disclose accurate and verifiable information, implement strong internal sustainability frameworks, and engage with independent third-party auditors. These practices help ensure transparency, build stakeholder trust, and align with global sustainability standards. Companies like Unilever have set a benchmark by developing clear sustainability goals, integrating comprehensive data collection, and regularly verifying their claims through external audits, thereby setting an example for credible and responsible environmental stewardship.

Understand What Constitutes Greenwashing

Understanding what constitutes greenwashing is essential for businesses that want to maintain integrity and build trust with their stakeholders. Greenwashing refers to the practice of making misleading claims about the environmental benefits of a product, service, or company practices to present an environmentally responsible public image. Several forms of greenwashing exist, including hidden trade-offs, where a company highlights a single sustainable attribute but ignores other significant impacts. For instance, a product labeled as “organic” might still be associated with high carbon emissions in its production. Misleading claims, such as vague terms like “eco-friendly” without robust evidence, also constitute greenwashing. Another example is the lack of proof where companies make assertions without accessible verifiable data. Incomplete disclosure and irrelevant claims are also common tactics; the former involves sharing only selective information, while the latter might emphasize irrelevant green features to distract consumers from alternative harmful practices. According to a report by McKinsey, 75% of companies are in early stages of ESG maturity and less ready for ESG assurance, highlighting the prevalence and risks of greenwashing. It is noted that companies facing ESG-related scandals typically experience an average decline in their stock price by 10%, demonstrating the financial risk associated with misleading ESG claims. To avoid greenwashing, businesses must ensure their environmental claims are specific, substantiated, and relevant, supported by comprehensive disclosures. Emphasizing complete and transparent reporting with third-party verification can protect against potential greenwashing accusations and foster greater consumer trust.

Disclose Accurate and Verifiable Information

Disclosing accurate and verifiable information is critical in maintaining the credibility of your business’s sustainability claims and avoiding greenwashing. By providing clear, specific, and detailed information, companies can ensure that stakeholders trust their environmental commitments. For example, using AI-powered Carbon Analyzers like those provided by Lythouse, firms can meticulously track Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, leveraging highly granular spend data and preconfigured emission databases. This method ensures unmatched accuracy in carbon accounting. Here’s a step-by-step approach to ensuring accurate and verifiable disclosures:

  1. Utilize Comprehensive Data Integration: Integrate data from multiple sources such as ERP systems, spreadsheets, databases, and direct uploads. This ensures that all relevant data points are captured and no critical information is omitted.
  2. Employ AI-Based Classification: Use AI to classify and map emission factors (EF), enriching each factor with metadata such as sector, validity, source, and calculation method. This preemptive categorization helps maintain data accuracy.
  3. Regular Updates and Audits: Regularly update data versions and conduct detailed audits overseen by environmental scientists. This includes tracking each emission factor and ensuring data integrity through audits and approvals.
  4. Interactive Dashboards: Create intuitive dashboards that allow stakeholders to view emissions trends and track Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) priorities. Stakeholders can drill down from comprehensive views to specific data points for detailed analysis.
  5. Transparent Reporting: Collaborate seamlessly through platforms like Lythouse’s Reporting Studio, which supports international frameworks such as GRI, SASB, TCFD, and more. This studio allows standardized data entry, easy configuration, and collaborative report filling.
  6. Approval Workflows: Implement a robust workflow for report approvals, ensuring that all disclosures are scrutinized by multiple experts. This also includes provisions for third-party verifications to further increase transparency.

Implement Strong Internal Sustainability Frameworks

Implementing strong internal sustainability frameworks is essential for businesses aiming for long-term environmental responsibility and success. A robust framework should include clearly defined goals, comprehensive data collection, and continuous monitoring as mentioned below:

  1. Set clear and measurable sustainability goals: Align goals with global standards such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs) and the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Utilize tools like ESG Goal Navigator to assist in setting and tracking these objectives.
  2. Ensure comprehensive data collection: Employ platforms that support various data sources and formats. This includes direct uploading of files, ERP system integrations, and third-party system data imports, ensuring that all relevant information is captured accurately.
  3. Establish regular updates and auditing protocols: Maintain data integrity by using platforms that offer audit trails and approval workflows to track changes and ensure data accuracy.
  4. Enhance stakeholder collaboration: Use centralized platforms, such as the Lythouse Collaboration Hub, which organizes tasks by type and priority, assigns ownership, and streamlines workflows. This ensures all stakeholders are engaged and contributing towards the sustainability goals. Moreover, enable continuous improvement through interactive dashboards that provide visibility into ESG metrics and allow for drill-down analysis of specific data points. These dashboards should be intuitive and allow users to edit, create, and share reports easily.
  5. Provide comprehensive training: Interactive training for employees and stakeholders on the importance and implementation of these frameworks to ensure a culture of sustainability throughout the organization.

By incorporating these elements, businesses can build a strong internal sustainability framework that supports accurate reporting, promotes transparency, and aligns with global sustainability standards.

Engage with Independent Third-Party Auditors

Engaging with independent third-party auditors is an essential practice for ensuring the credibility and reliability of your company’s sustainability efforts. Third-party audits provide an objective evaluation and verification of a company’s environmental claims and data, fostering greater transparency and trust among stakeholders. To effectively engage with third-party auditors, businesses can follow these steps:

  1. Select Reputable Auditors: Work with recognized and accredited auditing firms that have a proven track record in environmental and sustainability audits. Examples include the Big Four accounting firms (Deloitte, PwC, EY, and KPMG) and specialized environmental consulting firms.
  2. Prepare Comprehensive Documentation: Ensure all relevant data and documentation are organized and accessible. This includes detailed records of emissions, energy usage, waste management practices, and any other environmental impact data. Utilize platforms like Lythouse’s Collaboration Hub to streamline data collection and prepare for audits.
  3. Conduct Pre-Audit Assessments: Perform internal assessments to identify potential gaps and areas for improvement before the formal audit. This proactive approach can help resolve issues early and make the formal audit process smoother.
  4. Implement Robust Approval Workflows: Use audit trails and approval workflows to maintain data integrity and ensure that all changes and updates are tracked and approved by appropriate personnel. Lythouse offers features like dashboard drilldowns and audit trails to ensure data accuracy.
  5. Facilitate Transparent Communication: Maintain open and transparent communication with auditors throughout the process. Provide them with easy access to necessary information and be responsive to their inquiries. Utilize platforms that support easy data sharing and collaboration, such as the Lythouse ESG Reporting Studio, which allows for seamless integration and communication with third-party auditors.
  6. Review and Act on Audit Findings: Carefully review the audit findings and implement recommended actions to address any identified issues. This demonstrates a commitment to continuous improvement and enhances the credibility of your sustainability efforts.

According to McKinsey, 75% of companies are still in the early stages of ESG maturity, emphasizing the need for thorough and credible audits. Engaging third-party auditors not only helps in verifying your sustainability claims but also protects your company from potential greenwashing allegations, which can lead to significant financial repercussions, such as a 10% average decline in stock price for companies involved in ESG scandals. By adhering to these best practices, businesses can ensure their sustainability initiatives are trustworthy, transparent, and aligned with global standards.

Case Study: Unilever’s Commitment to Sustainable Living Plan

Unilever, one of the world’s largest consumer goods companies, offers a prominent example of how robust sustainability frameworks can be implemented effectively to avoid greenwashing. To ensure its sustainability claims were credible and to enhance transparency, Unilever launched its Sustainable Living Plan in 2010. The plan aimed to decouple the company’s growth from its environmental footprint and increase its positive social impact. The focus areas included improving health and well-being, reducing environmental impact, and enhancing livelihoods across its value chain.

Understand What Constitutes Greenwashing: Unilever’s commitment began with a clear distinction of what could be considered greenwashing. The company recognized that making broad claims without supporting evidence could mislead consumers. Therefore, Unilever focused on developing specific, measurable objectives. For instance, one of the targets was to halve the greenhouse gas impact of its products across the lifecycle by 2030. By setting such clear goals, Unilever aimed to avoid any misleading claims about the environmental benefits of its products.

Disclose Accurate and Verifiable Information: Unilever excelled in disclosing accurate and verifiable sustainability data. The company adhered to global reporting standards such as GRI and CDP. In annual reports, Unilever shared detailed metrics about its progress toward sustainability goals. For example, the company reported on its water usage, waste reduction, and greenhouse gas emissions with transparent data that was consistent with internationally recognized reporting frameworks. This commitment to transparency helped Unilever build trust with stakeholders and clearly communicate its sustainability efforts.

Implement Strong Internal Sustainability Frameworks: Internally, Unilever established a comprehensive framework to guide its sustainability initiatives. The framework was integrated into the company’s broader business strategy, ensuring that sustainability was a core part of decision-making processes. Unilever appointed a Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO) to oversee the implementation of the Sustainable Living Plan and report directly to the CEO. The company also launched various initiatives such as sustainable sourcing of agricultural raw materials and improving energy efficiency in manufacturing processes. These initiatives were tracked through internal metrics and reported publicly to maintain accountability.

Engage with Independent Third-Party Auditors: To verify its sustainability claims, Unilever regularly engaged with third-party auditors. The company worked with external auditors, including the Rainforest Alliance and Fairtrade Foundation, to certify that its sourcing practices met high sustainability standards. Additionally, Unilever’s sustainability reports were subject to external assurance, providing an extra layer of credibility and confidence to stakeholders regarding the integrity of the reported data.

This comprehensive approach ensured Unilever’s sustainability initiatives were not just marketing jargon but grounded in verifiable actions and measurable outcomes, significantly reducing the risk of greenwashing and enhancing the company’s reputation.


  • Unilever Sustainable Living Plan: Annual Report
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Sustainability Reporting Guidelines
  • Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP): Climate Change Reports


Effectively avoiding greenwashing requires a thorough understanding of misleading practices, committing to transparent and accurate disclosures, implementing robust internal sustainability frameworks, and engaging independent third-party auditors for validation. These steps not only safeguard a company’s reputation but also build consumer trust and ensure compliance with global standards. The example set by companies like Unilever demonstrates that genuine and measurable sustainability initiatives are crucial for long-term success and credibility. By adopting these best practices, businesses can contribute positively to environmental stewardship, avoid greenwashing pitfalls, and achieve sustainable growth.


For everyday updates, subscribe here.